Re: HDP proposed api (ver 0.2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> "Forcing" a source to specify the MDEP IDs here, even if not publishing the
>> record, makes checks easier further.
> 
> Not sure about that. Note that when you don't publish a SDP record, nobody 
> could connect to you, so you won't receive data channel connections request, 
> so you don't need to check if the mdeps are in use or not.

Indeed, you are right; from spec point of view I am not forced to define MDEP IDs beforehand (my old habits of TCP/IP, having ports both sides, sometimes overwhelm me :)

The actual argument is higher level: whether should we *force* the application to specify the MDEP IDs / data types beforehand (as I "voted", with "my" API) or not (as you "voted").

This is the point we need more opinions, from people in the list :)


>> Perhaps you tried to accomodate the notion that a data channel ID
>> "survives" even if the device disappearrs for a short moment?
> 
> Also this, remember that MCAP allow temporal disconnections to reestablish 
> them in future connections to save state.

Ok, I need to see whether BlueZ keeps the device objects in D-BUS tree after disconnection of if it removees it immediately. If it keeps the object, the sessions should be there as sub-paths (to be consistent with HdpSession being a part of adapter path.). If it doesn't, indeed they need to go somewhere else.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux