On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:22:58 -0400
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:41:24 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > > With this fixed, the test for non-zero tsk->mm is't really needed in
>> > > do_exit(), is it? I guess it makes sense though - sync_mm_rss() only
>> > > really works for kernel threads by luck..
>> >
>> > At first, I considered so, too. But I changed my mind to show
>> > "we know tsk->mm can be NULL here!" by code.
>> > Because __sync_mm_rss_stat() has BUG_ON(!mm), the code reader will think
>> > tsk->mm shouldn't be NULL always.
>> >
>> > Doesn't make sense ?
>>
>> uh, not really ;)
>>
>>
>> I think we should do this too:
>>
>> --- a/mm/memory.c~exit-fix-oops-in-sync_mm_rss-fix
>> +++ a/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ static void __sync_task_rss_stat(struct
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < NR_MM_COUNTERS; i++) {
>> if (task->rss_stat.count[i]) {
>> - BUG_ON(!mm);
>> add_mm_counter(mm, i, task->rss_stat.count[i]);
>> task->rss_stat.count[i] = 0;
>> }
>> _
>>
>> Because we just made sure it can't happen, and if it _does_ happen, the
>> oops will tell us the samme thing that the BUG_ON() would have.
>>
>
> Hmm, then, finaly..
> ==
>
> task->rss_stat wasn't initialized to 0 at copy_process().
> And __sync_task_rss_stat() should be static.
> removed BUG_ON(!mm) in __sync_task_rss_stat() for avoiding to show
> wrong information to code readers. Anyway, if !mm && task->rss_stat
> has some value, panic will happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
