El dom, 07-03-2010 a las 13:43 -0800, Marcel Holtmann escribió: > Hi Stefan, > > > > This is for recovering: > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/4619 > > > > > > since more users are getting this problem and I would like to know if > > > patches provided in that thread can be used and accepted by upstream or > > > they are not good enough. > > > > In case they only got overlooked, I can of course resend them. > > > > If they are not good enough, mentioning the problems might be > > helpful, so that I can do something about it ;) > > they didn't get overlooked. It was my mistake that I broke hcidump and I > now put everything back in the library. So 4.62 should fix it. I was > under the assumption that nothing ever used these symbols, but as it > seems I was clearly wrong. Sorry about that. > > Regards > > Marcel > > We should then simply wait for bluez-4.62 and, then, no patches would be needed for bluez-hcidump, not? (or I have missed anything?) Thanks a lot and best regards :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
