Re: What's the idea of security_cfm is called for both hci_proto_auth_cfm and hci_proto_encrypt_cfm? -resend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Liejun Tao <liejuntao001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
> Beside the l2cap issue with Blackberry 8900, I meet another l2cap
> connection failure issue when testing
> PTS AVRCP_TC_TG_PTT_BV_01_I.
>
> For 8900, the sequence is:
> l2cap_do_start(): send L2CAP_INFO_REQ
> security_cfm(): send L2CAP_CONN_REQ
> l2cap_information_rsp(): call l2cap_do_start(), send L2CAP_CONN_REQ again
>
> For PTS AVRCP_TC_TG_PTT_BV_01_I, the sequence is:
> l2cap_do_start(): send L2CAP_CONN_REQ
> security_cfm():send L2CAP_CONN_REQ again
> l2cap_conn_rsp(): receive L2CAP_CR_PEND
> l2cap_conn_rsp(): receive L2CAP_CR_NO_MEM
>
> In both cases, security_cfm() is called from hci_proto_encrypt_cfm(),
> and interrupt the normal sequence of l2cap connection.
>
> security_cfm() is also called in hci_proto_auth_cfm. I feel auth_cfm
> and encryption_cfm are for different events, why they call the same
> function?
>
> What's your mind to avoid 2 connection request?
>
> Aside, should we set a state bit after send l2CAP_CONN_REQ?
>

Ping.

Hi Marcel,
Any idea how to resolve these 2 issues?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux