On Wednesday 16 December 2009, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Siarhei Siamashka > > <siarhei.siamashka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also I don't have much trust in the current bluez SBC decoder > > implementation. Its quality may be not the very best. I was considering > > to eventually review its code, do some refactoring and merge some of its > > parts with the encoder (SBC encode and decode are quite symmetric), but > > did not find some spare time for this yet. Considering that bluez got SBC > > sink support now, improving the decoder may make sense. > > IMO it would make sense to export SBC codec in a library, since > encoding and decoding is done outside bluetoothd (ALSA, gstreamer or > PulseAudio). Also, the codec could be used for applications different > from A2DP streaming, and the more people using it, more tested (and > eventually improved) the code gets. I don't have first hand information regarding this matter myself, but according to SBC wikipedia page [1]: "The patent owners wrote that they allow the free usage of SBC in Bluetooth application, with the view to boost the use of this technology. All applications outside Bluetooth are however not free." So having SBC codec tightly coupled with bluez at least makes some sense. From purely technical point of view, a standalone library could be better. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SBC_(codec) -- Best regards, Siarhei Siamashka
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
