Hi Marcel, On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Nick, > >> >> Right now Bluez always requests flushable ACL packets (but does not >> >> set a flush timeout, so effectively they are non-flushable): >> >> >> >> However it is desirable to use an ACL flush timeout on A2DP packets so >> >> that if the ACL packets block for some reason then the LM can flush >> >> them to make room for newer packets. >> >> >> >> Is it reasonable for Bluez to use the 0x00 ACL packet boundary flag by >> >> default (non-flushable packet), and let userspace request flushable >> >> packets on A2DP L2CAP sockets with the socket option >> >> L2CAP_LM_RELIABLE. >> > >> > the reliable option has a different meaning. It comes back from the old >> > Bluetooth 1.1 qualification days where we had to tests on L2CAP that had >> > to confirm that we can detect malformed packets and report them. These >> > days it is just fine to drop them. >> >> Got it, how about introducing >> >> #define L2CAP_LM_FLUSHABLE 0x0040 > > that l2cap_sock_setsockopt_old() sets this didn't give you a hint that > we might wanna deprecate this socket options ;) > > I need to read up on the flushable stuff, but in the end it deserves its > own socket option. Also an ioctl() to actually trigger Enhanced flush > might be needed. > >> struct l2cap_pinfo { >> ... >> __u8 flushable; >> } > > Sure. In the long run we need to turn this into a bitmask. We are just > wasting memory here. Attached is an updated patch, that checks the LMP features bitmask before using the new non-flushable packet type. I am still using L2CAP_LM_FLUSHABLE socket option in l2cap_sock_setsockopt_old(), which I don't think you are happy with. So how about a new option: SOL_L2CAP, L2CAP_ACL_FLUSH which has a default value of 0, and can be set to 1 to make the ACL data sent by this L2CAP socket flushable. In a later commit we would then add SOL_ACL, ACL_FLUSH_TIMEOUT That is used to set an automatic flush timeout for the ACL link on a L2CAP socket. Note that SOL_ACL is new. But maybe this is not what you had in mind, so I'm looking for your advice before I implement this. Nick
Attachment:
0001-Bluetooth-Use-non-flushable-pb-flag-by-default-for-A.patch
Description: Binary data