> > tty_register_device appears to have been called with a NULL pointer. Not > > sure why however. > > if that is the pointer for the struct device, then that used to be fine > in the past. Not all RFCOMM device have a parent when they are created. The tty layer doesn't care about the struct device really. Nothing there has changed. The NULL passed appears to be the driver argument. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
