Hi Bastien: Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:13 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > Why? Instead of calling hid2hci, it would launch bluetoothd --udev, like > the other rules. Problem solved. > Good point, that's sensible enough. > > > If that's the only benefit, then, frankly, who cares. > > The main point is that people with an interested in Bluetooth will need > to go and fetch the code, and ask for patches to be committed. > > We're losing direct commit access to the code, and gaining something > that could have been achieved in the distro package. > > Eh, direct commit access? You submit it to this mailing list and Marcel has to ack it, you submit it to linux-hotplug and Kay or Martin acks it. Seems to be 6 eggs in one hand, half a dozen in the other. Look over the history, and those hacking on hid2hci have been me and Marcel: http://git.kernel.org/?p=bluetooth/bluez.git;a=history;f=tools/hid2hci.c;h=11d707fd76e940b884c9078907ab1 504cd7350d4;hb=HEAD -- Mario Limonciello *Dell | Linux Engineering* mario_limonciello@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
