On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 22:23 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 4. Mai 2009 19:29:02 schrieb Marcel Holtmann: > > Hi Peter, > > > > > What is the current status of btusb auto suspend? btusb not having this > > > feature basically renders BT useless on mobile devices. > > > > > > I found some rfc patches and discussion over on linux-pm/-usb but > > > couldn't find a clear consensus. > > > > I think none of the patches apply anymore. So they have to be redone > > against the latest -rc4 kernel or bluetooth-testing.git. > > I am porting forward to Linus' tree. I thought they'd safely wait for > the next merge window. > > > We had some battles with broken Bluetooth hardware that requires to keep > > the interrupt and bulk URBs in fly, because otherwise the firmware > > inside the controller can't sync them up and times out. These are all > > fixed now, but nobody has looked at the auto suspend stuff. Feel free to > > It will have to be changed to work with those buggy devices. > Do you have a pointer to a page describing the problem in detail? > > > pick Oliver's patches up and send them for review. If you do so, please > > use linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx since I do miss posting on LKML from > > time to time. > > Peter, are you willing to test? Sure, I have two laptops with integrated bluetooth to test on. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
