Re: eSCO or SCO link?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,
  I made a mistake when writing the email, I have not complete my question.

2009/3/31 卞磊 <mykofzone@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi All,
>  I have a stlc2500c which is a Bluetooth 1.2 chip. When debuging
> function 'hci_connect', i found the hci link type of the arguments was
> SCO_LINK, because i enabled 'lmp_esco_capable' in my kernel, it call
> 'hci_setup_sync' to setup eSCO link.

But when i check connection by 'hcitool con', the hcitool show it was
a SCO link. So, is it a SCO link or eSCO link? Thanks.

> struct hci_conn *hci_connect(struct hci_dev *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t
> *dst, __u8 auth_type)
> {
>        .....
>        if (lmp_esco_capable(hdev))
>        {
>                hci_setup_sync(sco, acl->handle);
>        }
>        else
>        {
>                hci_add_sco(sco, acl->handle);
>        }
>
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux