Hi Luiz, > I wonder why don't we use liboil > (http://liboil.freedesktop.org/wiki/). Since we can't keep > implementing, or don't want to, optimization code for each instruction > extension around. Liboil detects which implementation is faster at > runtime and there are many other codec implementations that depend on > it, it actually makes a lot of sense to gstream and PulseAudio which > already uses liboil. I know that means adding another dependency to > BlueZ, or perhaps it is time to make libsbc a real library? let me stop the discussion about liboil right now. I don't see any big advantage for BlueZ right now. This might change at some point in the future, but right now, we will not base around liboil. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
