Hi Dave, > Marcel, others, please bring some kind of closure to this > regression list entry: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 > Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git > Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 > Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 > > There is a patch, it is tested, so the only course of action at > this point is to merge the fix or declare that this really isn't > a regression. > > My impression is the later, because the driver btusb is replacing > doesn't handle suspend/resume either. Isn't that right? the original patch that I had was expecting changes in the USB subsystem that I deemed to much at this point. However Oliver got a patch that would make it work without the USB changes. I am still testing it. Let me see if I get some free minutes during the PlumbersConf to get this fully tested. Actually hci_usb is handling suspend/resume to some degree. So we could count this as regression. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
