Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> Our problem is only that we are using a workqueue and can't make any
> assumption when we get scheduled. This is obviously not perfect, but it
> seems there is nothing much that can be done.
> 
> I think the specification is simply bad and we have to live with it.

I guess so.

Since these are isoc URBs anyway, shouldn't you simply drop them until
the new altsetting is ready?  That's a lot easier than trying to keep
track of them and deferring them (which doesn't make much sense for
Isochronous data).

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux