Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:

> Question is if selecting the 2nd alternate setting and not submitting
> the URBs for it is a good idea or if that will still consume bandwidth
> and power. And thus it would be better to use the first alternate
> setting that is meant for the case with no SCO connections.

Installing the second altsetting and not submitting URBs will not
consume bandwidth.  It may consume a little power, but probably not
much more than just using the first altsetting.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux