Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: Pass the whole sqe to commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Jens,

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:28:14AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/21/23 5:44?AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > These three patches prepare for the sock support in the io_uring cmd, as
> > described in the following RFC:
> > 
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230406144330.1932798-1-leitao@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > Since the support linked above depends on other refactors, such as the sock
> > ioctl() sock refactor[1], I would like to start integrating patches that have
> > consensus and can bring value right now.  This will also reduce the patchset
> > size later.
> > 
> > Regarding to these three patches, they are simple changes that turn
> > io_uring cmd subsystem more flexible (by passing the whole SQE to the
> > command), and cleaning up an unnecessary compile check.
> > 
> > These patches were tested by creating a file system and mounting an NVME disk
> > using ubdsrv/ublkb0.
> 
> Looks mostly good to me, do agree with Christoph's comments on the two
> patches. Can you spin a v3? Would be annoying to miss 6.4 with this, as
> other things will be built on top of it.

Sure. I've just sent V3 with all the fixes discussed in this email
thread.

Here is the link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/4/30/91



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux