On 2023-04-26 18:26:11-0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/26/23 5:12?PM, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote: > > Hi Martin, Christoph, Jens, > > > > On 2023-03-20 07:56:58-0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>> The embedded member integrity_kobj member of struct gendisk violates > >>> the assumption of the driver core that only one struct kobject should > >>> be embedded into another object and then manages its lifetime. > >>> > >>> As the integrity_kobj is only used to hold a few sysfs attributes it > >>> can be replaced by direct device_attributes and removed. > >> > >> Looks good to me and passed a quick test on a couple of systems. Thanks > >> for cleaning this up! > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Am I getting some part of the process for block/ wrong? > > Sorry, I missed this series. I'll queue it up for 6.4. Thanks! > > It seems my patches for the block subsystem are having a hard time > > getting merged. > > > > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221110052438.2188-1-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > This one is missing nbd review. It's unfortunately not uncommon to need > to re-ping on something like this, if you don't get a timely review. > This is not specific to this patch, just in general. Things get missed. Will do. > > * this series > > * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419-const-partition-v2-0-817b58f85cd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > This one is just a week old, and coming into the merge window. Generally > takes longer at that time, as it's late for that merge window, and folks > are busy with getting things ready. If nothing happens on this one, I'd > suggest resending past -rc1 when folks are more ready to review and > queue things up for the next release. Indeed, it is only listed for completeness sake. I assumed that because all three series were like this, that I maybe missed some PATCH prefix for your filter, managed to end up in your killfile or mails from my privately managed mailservers don't get through. This is why I also wrote to Martin and Christoph, fearing that you don't see my mails. Thanks for the clarification, Thomas
