[PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: fold __blk_mq_insert_request into blk_mq_insert_request

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

There is no good point in keeping the __blk_mq_insert_request around
for two function calls and a singler caller.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 14 ++------------
 block/blk-mq.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 05be4ae4fc0dba..4f0ecd0561e48f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2465,17 +2465,6 @@ static inline void __blk_mq_insert_req_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &ctx->rq_lists[type]);
 }
 
-void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
-			     bool at_head)
-{
-	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
-
-	__blk_mq_insert_req_list(hctx, rq, at_head);
-	blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
-}
-
 /**
  * blk_mq_request_bypass_insert - Insert a request at dispatch list.
  * @rq: Pointer to request to be inserted.
@@ -2600,7 +2589,8 @@ static void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
 		e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, &list, at_head);
 	} else {
 		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-		__blk_mq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
+		__blk_mq_insert_req_list(hctx, rq, at_head);
+		blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
 		spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 	}
 
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index 192784836f8a83..c2aec5cbfa7663 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -59,8 +59,6 @@ void blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
 /*
  * Internal helpers for request insertion into sw queues
  */
-void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
-				bool at_head);
 void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
 				  bool run_queue);
 
-- 
2.39.2