Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] null_blk: add modparam checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] null_blk: add modparam checks
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:02:15 -0600
Cc: damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx, bvanassche@xxxxxxx, shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx, vincent.fu@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230330213134.131298-1-kch@nvidia.com>
References: <20230330213134.131298-1-kch@nvidia.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0

Please take Damien's advice from v1 and compact these patches. This is
getting somewhat out of hand and silly, imho. Are we gaming patch
counts?! If not, what's the point?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] null_blk: add modparam checks
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

References:
- [PATCH V2 0/9] null_blk: add modparam checks
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] null_blk: usr memcpy_[to|from]_page()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] zram: remove the call to page_endio in the bio end_io handler
Previous by thread: [PATCH V2 9/9] null_blk: avoid use global modparam g_irq_mode
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] null_blk: add modparam checks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux