Re: [PATCH 2/9] null_blk: check for valid submit_queue value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I would do this:
>
> +#define NULL_PARAM(_name, _min, _max)                                  \
> +static int null_param_##_name##_set(const char *s,                     \
> +                                   const struct kernel_param *kp)      \
> +{                                                                      \
> +       return null_param_store_int(s, kp->arg, _min, _max);            \
> +}                                                                      \
> +                                                                       \
> +static const struct kernel_param_ops null_##_name##_param_ops = {      \
> +       .set    = null_param_##_name##_set,                             \
> +       .get    = param_get_int,                                        \
> +}
> +
>
> And then have:
>
> +NULL_PARAM(submit_queues, 1, INT_MAX);
> +NULL_PARAM(poll_queues, 1, num_online_cpus());
> +NULL_PARAM(queue_mode, NULL_Q_BIO, NULL_Q_MQ);
> +NULL_PARAM(gb, 1, INT_MAX);
> +NULL_PARAM(bs, 512, 4096);
> +NULL_PARAM(max_sectors, 1, INT_MAX);
> +NULL_PARAM(irqmode, NULL_IRQ_NONE, NULL_IRQ_TIMER);
> +NULL_PARAM(hw_qdepth, 1, INT_MAX);
>
> That can be done in a single patch and is overall a lot less code.
>

I did the same thing at first, however it doesn't allow us to print
the right module parameter specific error message which I
to add in this series especially for  where this patch limits it
nr_online_cpu().

let me send out V2 with right error messages ...

-ck






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux