On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:16 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe() can be a confusing name. It may read as > "irqs are disabled throughout", which is what the current implementation > does (currently under discussion [1]), but is not the intention. The > intention is that this function is safe to call from atomic contexts. > Name it as such. > > Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
