Am 25.03.23 um 15:07 schrieb Markus Elfring: > Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 18:32:05 +0100 > > The label “nla_put_failure” was used to jump to another pointer check > despite of the detail in the implementation of the function > “nla_put_drbd_cfg_context” that it was determined already that > the corresponding variable contained a null pointer. > > * Thus return directly after a call of the function > “nla_nest_start_noflag” failed. > > * Delete an extra pointer check which became unnecessary > with this refactoring. > > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Fixes: 543cc10b4cc5c60aa9fcc62705ccfb9998bf4697 ("drbd: drbd_adm_get_status needs to show some more detail") > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c > index f49f2a5282e1..9cb947127472 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c > +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c > @@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ static int nla_put_drbd_cfg_context(struct sk_buff *skb, > struct nlattr *nla; > nla = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, DRBD_NLA_CFG_CONTEXT); > if (!nla) > - goto nla_put_failure; > + return -EMSGSIZE; > if (device && > nla_put_u32(skb, T_ctx_volume, device->vnr)) > goto nla_put_failure; > @@ -3205,8 +3205,7 @@ static int nla_put_drbd_cfg_context(struct sk_buff *skb, > return 0; > > nla_put_failure: > - if (nla) > - nla_nest_cancel(skb, nla); > + nla_nest_cancel(skb, nla); > return -EMSGSIZE; > } > > -- > 2.40.0 > Sorry, I fail to see how this is an improvement over the status quo, much less a "fix". Can you identify the issue with the current code and can you explain how your patch makes it better? -- Christoph Böhmwalder LINBIT | Keeping the Digital World Running DRBD HA — Disaster Recovery — Software defined Storage