Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: Split and submit bios in LBA order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/26/23 01:31, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/24/23 19:00, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> The trick here could be to have the UFS LLD to unlock the target zone of a write
>> when the command is sent to the device, instead of when the command completes.
>> This way, the zone is still locked when there is a requeue and there is no
>> reordering. That could allow for write qd > 1 in the case of UFS. And this
>> method could actually work for regular writes too.
> 
> Hi Damien,
> 
> Although the above sounds interesting to me, I think the following two 
> scenarios are not handled by the above approach and can lead to reordering:
> * The SCSI device reporting a unit attention.
> * The SCSI device responding with the SCSI status "BUSY". The UFS 
> standard explicitly allows this. From the UFS standard: "If the unit is 
> not ready to accept a new command (e.g., still processing previous 
> command) a STATUS response of BUSY will be returned."

Yes, that likely would be an issue for regular writes, but likely not for zone
append emulation using regular writes though, since a "busy" return for a ZA
emulated regular write can be resent later with a different aligned write location.

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux