On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:23:10AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:23:49PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This is for mostly for testing purposes. > > I have to admit I'd rather not merge this upstream. Any good reason > why we'd absolutely would want to have it? The only value is that it's the easiest fabric to exercise some of these generic code paths, and it's how I validated the fix in patch 3. Otherwise this is has no other practical use case, so I don't mind dropping it. Let's just go with patch 3 only from this series. I'll rework patch 1 atop Sagi's rdma affinity removal since it's a nice cleanup.
