On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:23:10AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:23:49PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This is for mostly for testing purposes. > > I have to admit I'd rather not merge this upstream. Any good reason > why we'd absolutely would want to have it? The blktest I have written for this problem fails for loop without something like this. We can certaintanly teach blktests not run a specific test for loop but currently, the _require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics check is including loop.
