Re: [PATCH V2 08/17] block: ublk_drv: don't consider flush request in map/unmap io

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 08/17] block: ublk_drv: don't consider flush request in map/unmap io
From: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:50:21 +0800
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230307141520.793891-9-ming.lei@redhat.com>
References: <20230307141520.793891-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20230307141520.793891-9-ming.lei@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1

On 2023/3/7 22:15, Ming Lei wrote:
> There isn't data in request of REQ_OP_FLUSH always, so don't consider
> it in both ublk_map_io() and ublk_unmap_io().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH V2 00/17] io_uring/ublk: add IORING_OP_FUSED_CMD
  - From: Ming Lei
- [PATCH V2 08/17] block: ublk_drv: don't consider flush request in map/unmap io
  - From: Ming Lei

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V2 06/17] block: ublk_drv: mark device as LIVE before adding disk
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix handling single range discard request
Previous by thread: [PATCH V2 08/17] block: ublk_drv: don't consider flush request in map/unmap io
Next by thread: [PATCH V2 17/17] block: ublk_drv: apply io_uring FUSED_CMD for supporting zero copy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]