Hi,
在 2023/02/21 17:14, Damien Le Moal 写道:
On 2/21/23 17:29, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
As explained in commit b600de2d7d3a ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in
bic_set_bfqq()"), bfqq should not be freed before bic_set_bfqq().
However, this is broken while merging commit 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq:
split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis") from branch
for-6.3/block.
The patch looks OK to me, but the commit message is not super clear. What is
broken exactly ?
1) bfq_sync_bfqq_move() is introduced in commit 9778369a2d6c ("block,
bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis"), which is merged to
block/for-6.3 branch.
2) commit 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'")
is merged to mainline.
3) later, the fix for 2) b600de2d7d3a ("block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in
bic_set_bfqq()") is merged to mainline as well, however,
bfq_sync_bfqq_move() in block/for-6.3 branch is not changed.
4) At last, 1) is merged to mainline and bfq_sync_bfqq_move() is
still problematic.
Thanks,
Kuai
Fixes: 9778369a2d6c ("block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/bfq-cgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
index ea3638e06e04..89ffb3aa992c 100644
--- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
@@ -746,8 +746,8 @@ static void bfq_sync_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* old cgroup.
*/
bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq);
- bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, true, act_idx);
+ bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq);
}
}
