On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:49:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > ublk adds a bit of latency overhead, but I think this is acceptable at least > > until we have a great, proven solution, which could be turned into > > an in-kernel FTL. > > We will keep improving ublk io path, and I am working on ublk > copy. Once it is done, big chunk IO latency could be reduced a lot. s/copy/zero copy Thanks, Ming
