Re: [GIT PULL] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (pin or just list)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/30/23 2:33 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/30/23 4:14 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Could you consider pulling this patchset into the block tree?  I think that
>> Al's fears wrt to pinned pages being removed from page tables causing deadlock
>> have been answered.  Granted, there is still the issue of how to handle
>> vmsplice and a bunch of other places to fix, not least skbuff handling.
>>
>> I also have patches to fix cifs in a separate branch that I would also like to
>> push in this merge window - and that requires the first two patches from this
>> series also, so would it be possible for you to merge at least those two
>> rather than manually applying them?
> 
> I've pulled this into a separate branch, but based on the block branch,
> for-6.3/iov-extract. It's added to for-next as well.

This does cause about a 2.7% regression for me, using O_DIRECT on a raw
block device. Looking at a perf diff, here's the top:

               +2.71%  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] mod_node_page_state
               +2.22%  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] iov_iter_extract_pages

and these two are gone:

     2.14%             [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc
     1.53%             [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] iov_iter_get_pages

rest is mostly in the noise, but mod_node_page_state() sticks out like
a sore thumb. They seem to be caused by the node stat accounting done
in gup.c for FOLL_PIN.

Hmm?

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux