On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:16:57PM +0900, Huijin Park wrote: > In general, fsync has a larger overhead than fdatasync. And since the > dio option is for data, it seems like fdatasync is enough. > So this patch changes it to fdatasync which has little load relatively. The only difference is that fsync also syncs the timestamps. So this change looks correct, but also a bit useless given that buffered to direct I/O or back changes aren't exactly a fast path.
