On 1/24/23 11:02, Niklas Cassel wrote:
Introduce the new block IO status BLK_STS_DURATION_LIMIT for LLDDs to report command that failed due to a command duration limit being exceeded. This new status is mapped to the ETIME error code to allow users to differentiate "soft" duration limit failures from other more serious hardware related errors.
What makes exceeding the duration limit different from an I/O timeout (BLK_STS_TIMEOUT)? Why is it important to tell the difference between an I/O timeout and exceeding the command duration limit?
Thanks, Bart.
