Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 23:37:37 -0800
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230112140412.667308-15-niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
References: <20230112140412.667308-1-niklas.cassel@wdc.com> <20230112140412.667308-15-niklas.cassel@wdc.com>

Is sysfs really the right interface here?  I would have expected an
ioctl (and for kernel use method) on the block device to more
useful.  Especially all the dynamic sysfs manipulation from a driver
is a little scary to me.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits
  - From: Damien Le Moal

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/18] Add Command Duration Limits support
  - From: Niklas Cassel
- [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits
  - From: Niklas Cassel

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 08/18] block: introduce BLK_STS_DURATION_LIMIT
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 00/34] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (ref, pin or just list)
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] scsi: sd: detect support for command duration limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]