On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 13:35:30 +0100, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> Some more mostly trivial "alignment patches" to (slowly but surely)
> move further in the direction of re-upstreaming DRBD.
>
> These should be fairly uncontroversial.
>
> Andreas Gruenbacher (1):
> drbd: drbd_insert_interval(): Clarify comment
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/8] drbd: adjust drbd_limits license header
commit: f4095e7643c0fd00f1c125388d6d83d60875d489
[2/8] drbd: fix DRBD_VOLUME_MAX 65535 -> 65534
commit: f7fb0227ae90fff4d09d969c353e8a30f2e0edcc
[3/8] drbd: make limits unsigned
commit: 4e5ebce4a5dde36316a78550c9f7b97a9e03302b
[4/8] drbd: remove unnecessary assignment in vli_encode_bits
commit: 93a8026b0d7161597437eb2d87ceac4f194991c4
[5/8] drbd: remove macros using require_context
commit: 00f0c8eccb383782621c74e5bd2ce9b4b8dbad5a
[6/8] MAINTAINERS: add drbd headers
commit: 463afd417b268d18d3c83ec0851e978dd12daaa2
[7/8] drbd: interval tree: make removing an "empty" interval a no-op
commit: 6928e2f7919aa3cd4e31aba5b16f6f212df2bb35
[8/8] drbd: drbd_insert_interval(): Clarify comment
commit: 2b0802d1ac9333d060312b22e9d898614253adcf
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
