CC Jan.
在 2023/01/12 19:24, Artem Chernyshev 写道:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 07:09:10PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
Hi,
在 2023/01/12 17:43, Artem Chernyshev 写道:
It is possible for bfqg to be NULL after being initialized as result of
blkg_to_bfqg() function.
That was achieved on kernel 5.15.78, but should exist in mainline as
well
The problem is already fixed in mainline by following patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f02be9002c480cd3ec0fcf184ad27cf531bd6ece
Thanks,
Kuai
host1 login: [ 460.855794] watchdog: watchdog0: watchdog did not stop!
[ 898.944512] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000094
[ 899.285776] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 899.536511] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 899.647305] connection4:0: detected conn error (1020)
[ 899.786794] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 899.786799] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ 899.786802] CPU: 15 PID: 6073 Comm: ID iothread1 Not tainted 5.15.78-1.el7virt.x86_64 #1
[ 899.786804] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/21/2019
[ 899.786806] RIP: 0010:bfq_bio_bfqg+0x26/0x80
[ 901.325944] Code: 0f 1f 40 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 fd 48 89 f7 53 48 8b 56 48 48 85 d2
74 32 48 63 05 83 7f 35 01 48 83 c0 16 48 8b 5c c2 08 <80> bb 94 00 00 00 00 00
[ 902.237825] RSP: 0018:ffffae2649437688 EFLAGS: 00010002
[ 902.493396] RAX: 0000000000000019 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dead000000000122
[ 902.841529] RDX: ffff8b6012cb3a00 RSI: ffff8b71002bbed0 RDI: ffff8b71002bbed0
[ 903.189374] RBP: ffff8b601c46e800 R08: ffffae26494377c8 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 903.532985] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000008 R12: ffff8b6f844c5b30
[ 903.880809] R13: ffff8b601c46e800 R14: ffffae2649437760 R15: ffff8b601c46e800
[ 904.220054] FS: 00007fec2fc4a700(0000) GS:ffff8b7f7f640000(0000) kn1GS:00000000000000000
[ 904.614349] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 904.894717] CR2: 0000000000000094 CR3: 0000000111fd8002 CR4: 00000000003726e0
[ 905.243702] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 905.592493] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 905.936859] Call Trace:
[ 906.055955] <TASK>
[ 906.158109] bfq_bic_update_cgroup+0x2c/0x1f0
[ 906.371057] bfq_insert_requests+0x2c2/0x1fb0
[ 906.579207] blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0xc2/0x140
[ 906.817640] __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0xe0/0x1f0
[ 907.055737] blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x4e/0xa0
[ 907.298547] dm_mq_queue_rq+0x217/0x3e0
[ 907.485935] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x14b/0x860
[ 907.711973] ? sbitmap_get+0x87/0x1a0
[ 907.890370] blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x350/0x3b0
[ 908.074869] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 40
Fixes: 075a53b78b81 ("bfq: Make sure bfqg for which we are queueing requests is online")
Co-developed-by: Anton Fadeev <anton.fadeev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anton Fadeev <anton.fadeev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/bfq-cgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
index 1b2829e99dad..d4e9428cdbe5 100644
--- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio)
continue;
}
bfqg = blkg_to_bfqg(blkg);
- if (bfqg->online) {
+ if (bfqg && bfqg->online) {
bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, &blkg->blkcg->css);
return bfqg;
}
Sorry, forgot to mention, what behaviour was the same after we applied this patch. Issue
was resolved only when we added NULL checking for bfqg.
So, you mean that blkg is still online, while blkg_to_bfqg() return
NULL. Can you explan how this is possible? I can't figure out how this
is possible...
Thanks,
Kuai
Thanks,
Artem
.
