On 12.01.23 10:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move the code that splits the ordered extents and records the physical
> location for them to the storage layer so that the higher level consumers
> don't have to care about physical block numbers at all. This will also
> allow to eventually remove accounting for the zone append write sizes in
> the upper layer with a little bit more block layer work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
What base is this against? I'm getting the following:
Applying: btrfs: handle recording of zoned writes in the storage layer
fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function ‘btrfs_submit_direct’:
fs/btrfs/inode.c:7842:25: error: label ‘out_err’ used but not defined
7842 | goto out_err;
| ^~~~
Specifically that hunk needs to be removed:
@@ -7911,7 +7888,6 @@ static void btrfs_submit_direct(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
out_err_em:
free_extent_map(em);
-out_err:
dio_bio->bi_status = status;
btrfs_dio_private_put(dip);
}
But trivial to fix up when applying.
