Re: SG_IO ioctl regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SG_IO ioctl regression
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:27:47 -0700
Cc: "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Y77J/w0gf2nIDMd/@x1-carbon>
References: <20230105190741.2405013-6-kbuschmeta!com> <Y77J/w0gf2nIDMd/@x1-carbon>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:38:56PM +0000, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> It appears that this commit breaks SG_IO ioctl.

Thanks for the catch. I'll send either a fix or revert today.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SG_IO ioctl regression
  - From: Keith Busch

References:
- SG_IO ioctl regression
  - From: Niklas Cassel

Prev by Date: SG_IO ioctl regression
Next by Date: [PATCH v5] blk-throtl: Introduce sync and async queues for blk-throtl
Previous by thread: SG_IO ioctl regression
Next by thread: Re: SG_IO ioctl regression
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux