Now that all RCU flavors have been combined either holding a spin lock, disabling irq or disabling preemption implies RCU read lock, so there's no need to use rcu_read_[un]lock() explicitly while holding queue_lock. This shouldn't cause any behavior changes. v2: Description updated. Leave __acquires/release on queue_lock alone. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index ce6a2b7d3dfb..7d338bc84387 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -672,12 +672,12 @@ struct block_device *blkcg_conf_open_bdev(char **inputp) * * Parse per-blkg config update from @input and initialize @ctx with the * result. @ctx->blkg points to the blkg to be updated and @ctx->body the - * part of @input following MAJ:MIN. This function returns with RCU read - * lock and queue lock held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish(). + * part of @input following MAJ:MIN. This function returns with queue lock + * held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish(). */ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol, char *input, struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx) - __acquires(rcu) __acquires(&bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) + __acquires(&bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) { struct block_device *bdev; struct gendisk *disk; @@ -699,7 +699,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol, if (ret) goto fail; - rcu_read_lock(); spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) { @@ -728,7 +727,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol, /* Drop locks to do new blkg allocation with GFP_KERNEL. */ spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - rcu_read_unlock(); new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, disk, GFP_KERNEL); if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) { @@ -742,7 +740,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol, goto fail_exit_queue; } - rcu_read_lock(); spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) { @@ -778,7 +775,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol, radix_tree_preload_end(); fail_unlock: spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - rcu_read_unlock(); fail_exit_queue: blk_queue_exit(q); fail: @@ -805,10 +801,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_prep); * with blkg_conf_prep(). */ void blkg_conf_finish(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx) - __releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) __releases(rcu) + __releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) { spin_unlock_irq(&bdev_get_queue(ctx->bdev)->queue_lock); - rcu_read_unlock(); blkdev_put_no_open(ctx->bdev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_finish); -- 2.39.0