On 1/3/23 18:53, Kemeng Shi wrote: > We jump to tag only for returning current rq. Return directly to > remove this tag. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c > index 9ff424c78e9b..a11be312ac77 100644 > --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c > +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c > @@ -4966,7 +4966,7 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, > bfq_dispatch_remove(bfqd->queue, rq); > > if (bfqq != bfqd->in_service_queue) > - goto return_rq; > + return rq; > > /* > * If weight raising has to terminate for bfqq, then next > @@ -4986,12 +4986,9 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, > * belongs to CLASS_IDLE and other queues are waiting for > * service. > */ > - if (!(bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) > 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq))) > - goto return_rq; > + if (bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) > 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq)) > + bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED); > > - bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED); > - > -return_rq: > return rq; > } > Looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research