Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 23-12-22 03:16:37, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> The bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check is along with previous
> "bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0 ||" check, so no need to re-check
> bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I have nothing against this but OTOH in this complex condition the original
version looks more readable than the new one to me.

								Honza

> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index ebcafe3c4c3b..7c91d16dbf6f 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2204,8 +2204,7 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq)
>  		 */
>  		if (bfqq == bfqd->in_service_queue &&
>  		    (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0 ||
> -		     (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns > 0 &&
> -		      bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0)) &&
> +		     (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns > 0 && bfqd->rqs_injected)) &&
>  		    time_is_before_eq_jiffies(bfqq->decrease_time_jif +
>  					      msecs_to_jiffies(10))) {
>  			bfqd->last_empty_occupied_ns = ktime_get_ns();
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux