Hi, Christoph
在 2022/12/21 18:33, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 11:05:24AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
@@ -459,6 +459,8 @@ struct ioc_gq {
struct blkg_policy_data pd;
struct ioc *ioc;
+ bool online;
Nit: maybe tab align this field like the fields above it.
+static void ioc_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
+{
+ struct ioc_gq *iocg = pd_to_iocg(pd);
+ struct ioc *ioc = iocg->ioc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (ioc) {
How could ioc be NULL here?
As I explained in another thread.. pd_offline_fn() can be called without
pd_init_fn(), which is a bug from upper layer...
blkcg_activate_policy
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list
pd_alloc_fn(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN,...) -> failed
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
// release queue_lock here is problematic, this will cause
pd_offline_fn called without pd_init_fn.
pd_alloc_fn(__GFP_NOWARN,...)
Thanks,
Kuai
.