On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 09:29:36 -0600, Greg Joyce wrote: > On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 22:46 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > Perhaps naming it `OPAL_MAX_KEY_LEN` would help clarify this? > > I'm not averse to changing it because it would be clearer. My concern > is that it's been OPAL_KEY_MAX for 5+ years (the original SED Opal > commit). Unless there is strong consensus to change it, I'm going to > leave it as the original name. I don't care about the name (very much in the peanut gallery), just it not being a magic number :) . --Ben
