Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/9] blk-iocost: improve hanlder of match_u64()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:21:49PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 1) There are one place that return value of match_u64() is not checked.
> 2) If match_u64() failed, return value is set to -EINVAL despite that
>    there are other possible errnos.

Ditto. Does this matter?

-- 
tejun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux