From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> Our test report a problem: ------------[ cut here ]------------ list_del corruption. next->prev should be ffff888127e0c4b0, but was ffff888127e090b0 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3117789 at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry_valid+0x119/0x130 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x119/0x130 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x119/0x130 Call Trace: <IRQ> iocg_flush_stat.isra.0+0x11e/0x230 ? ioc_rqos_done+0x230/0x230 ? ioc_now+0x14f/0x180 ioc_timer_fn+0x569/0x1640 We haven't reporduced it yet, but we think this is due to parent iocg is freed before child iocg, and then in ioc_timer_fn, walk_list is corrupted. 1) Remove child cgroup can concurrent with remove parent cgroup, and ioc_pd_free for parent iocg can be called before child iocg. This can be fixed by moving the handle of walk_list to ioc_pd_offline, since that offline from child is ensured to be called before parent. 2) ioc_pd_free can be triggered from both removing device and removing cgroup, this patch fix the problem by deleting timer before deactivating policy, so that free parent iocg first in this case won't matter. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx> --- block/blk-iocost.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 710cf63a1643..d2b873908f88 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -2813,13 +2813,14 @@ static void ioc_rqos_exit(struct rq_qos *rqos) { struct ioc *ioc = rqos_to_ioc(rqos); + del_timer_sync(&ioc->timer); + blkcg_deactivate_policy(rqos->q, &blkcg_policy_iocost); spin_lock_irq(&ioc->lock); ioc->running = IOC_STOP; spin_unlock_irq(&ioc->lock); - del_timer_sync(&ioc->timer); free_percpu(ioc->pcpu_stat); kfree(ioc); } -- 2.31.1