[PATCH linux-next] block: use strscpy() is more robust and safer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxx>
---
 block/elevator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index a5bdc3b1e7e5..0885b66c3868 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ ssize_t elv_iosched_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *buf,
 	if (!elv_support_iosched(q))
 		return count;

-	strlcpy(elevator_name, buf, sizeof(elevator_name));
+	strscpy(elevator_name, buf, sizeof(elevator_name));
 	ret = elevator_change(q, strstrip(elevator_name));
 	if (!ret)
 		return count;
-- 
2.15.2



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux