Hi,
在 2022/11/03 16:06, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
Yes, this is a good one. Please add a single sentence blurb explaing
the issue before the Test prodecure?
Ok, I'll do that.
With that this looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:55:40AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Test procedures:
1) dmsetup create test --table "xxx sda", assume dm-0 is created
2) dmsetup suspend test
3) dmsetup reload test --table "xxx dm-0"
4) dmsetup resume test
Can you wire this up for blocktests?
Of course I can, I'm not very familiar with how to add new test in
blktests, so I might take some time to do that.
I've also been wondering how we could wire your other two test cases
up as I think they'be very useful. Hopefully I can find some time
to inject delays with eBPF or something like it.
The problem was found without the delay originally, such delay can make
sure the problem is reproduced 100%, but it's still possible without the
delay. Perhaps we can add the test without delay for now.
Thanks,
Kuai
.
