Re: [PATCH] block: fix Werror=format with GCC 13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24. 10. 22, 21:01, Martin Liška wrote:
Starting with GCC 13, since
[g3b3083a598ca3f4b] c: C2x enums wider than int [PR36113]

GCC promotes enum values with larger than integer types to a wider type.
In case of the anonymous enum type in blk-iocost.c it is:

enum {
	MILLION			= 1000000,
...

	WEIGHT_ONE		= 1 << 16,
...
	VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT	= 37,
	VTIME_PER_SEC		= 1LLU << VTIME_PER_SEC_SHIFT,
...

as seen VTIME_PER_SEC cannot fit into 32-bits (int type), thus one needs
to use 'long unsigned int' in the format string.

It fixes then the following 2 warnings:

block/blk-iocost.c: In function ‘ioc_weight_prfill’:
block/blk-iocost.c:3035:37: error: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
  3035 |                 seq_printf(sf, "%s %u\n", dname, iocg->cfg_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
       |                                    ~^            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                     |                             |
       |                                     unsigned int                  long unsigned int
       |                                    %lu
block/blk-iocost.c: In function ‘ioc_weight_show’:
block/blk-iocost.c:3045:34: error: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
  3045 |         seq_printf(sf, "default %u\n", iocc->dfl_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
       |                                 ~^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                  |                      |
       |                                  unsigned int           long unsigned int
       |                                 %lu

But introduces two with gcc-12 ;):
> block/blk-iocost.c: In function ‘ioc_weight_prfill’:
> block/blk-iocost.c:3037:38: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘u32’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} [-Werror=format=] > 3037 | seq_printf(sf, "%s %lu\n", dname, iocg->cfg_weight / WEIGHT_ONE); > | ~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | | | > | long unsigned int u32 {aka unsigned int}
>       |                                    %u


Note that:
1) the specs says enum behaves as int, or uint in some cases
2) iocc->dfl_weight is u32, i.e. uint
   WEIGHT_ONE is 1 << 16, i.e. int
   so the promotion should be to s32/int. Or not?

I think gcc-13 is wrong -- incosistent with gcc-12 at least.

Signed-off-by: Martin Liska <mliska@xxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-iocost.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 495396425bad..f165bac9bffb 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ static u64 ioc_weight_prfill(struct seq_file *sf, struct blkg_policy_data *pd,
  	struct ioc_gq *iocg = pd_to_iocg(pd);
if (dname && iocg->cfg_weight)
-		seq_printf(sf, "%s %u\n", dname, iocg->cfg_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
+		seq_printf(sf, "%s %lu\n", dname, iocg->cfg_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
  	return 0;
  }
@@ -3042,7 +3042,7 @@ static int ioc_weight_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
  	struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(seq_css(sf));
  	struct ioc_cgrp *iocc = blkcg_to_iocc(blkcg);
- seq_printf(sf, "default %u\n", iocc->dfl_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
+	seq_printf(sf, "default %lu\n", iocc->dfl_weight / WEIGHT_ONE);
  	blkcg_print_blkgs(sf, blkcg, ioc_weight_prfill,
  			  &blkcg_policy_iocost, seq_cft(sf)->private, false);
  	return 0;

thanks,
--
js
suse labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux