Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] nvme: use macro definitions for setting reservation values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] nvme: use macro definitions for setting reservation values
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:20:54 -0600
Cc: linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, oren@xxxxxxxxxx, chaitanyak@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20221002082851.13222-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
References: <20221002082851.13222-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:28:51AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> This makes the code more readable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v2 1/1] nvme: use macro definitions for setting reservation values
  - From: Max Gurtovoy

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] nvme: use macro definitions for setting reservation values
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: avoid double ->queue_rq() because of early timeout
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] nvme: use macro definitions for setting reservation values
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: simplify probe function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux