On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 12:07:26AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> Function blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() is missing zeroing/init of rq->bio,
> biotail, __sector, and __data_len members, which blk_mq_alloc_request()
> has.
>
> Move init'ing of those members to common blk_mq_rq_ctx_init().
>
> Fixes: 1f5bd336b9150 ("blk-mq: add blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx")
> Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 8070b6c10e8d..260adeb2e455 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,10 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
> }
> }
>
> + rq->__data_len = 0;
> + rq->__sector = (sector_t) -1;
> + rq->bio = rq->biotail = NULL;
> +
> return rq;
> }
>
> @@ -591,9 +595,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, blk_opf_t opf,
> if (!rq)
> goto out_queue_exit;
> }
> - rq->__data_len = 0;
> - rq->__sector = (sector_t) -1;
> - rq->bio = rq->biotail = NULL;
This patch looks not good, why do you switch to initialize the three fields
twice in fast path?
BTW, we know blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() has big trouble, so please
avoid to extend it to other use cases.
Thanks,
Ming
