Re: [PATCH -nect RFC v2 0/2] block: fix uaf in bd_link_disk_holder()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -nect RFC v2 0/2] block: fix uaf in bd_link_disk_holder()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:47:12 +0200
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kch@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20221020132049.3947415-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20221020132049.3947415-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

As mentioned before I don't think we should make this even more
crufty in the block layer.  See the series I just sent to move it int
dm.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -nect RFC v2 0/2] block: fix uaf in bd_link_disk_holder()
  - From: Yu Kuai

References:
- [PATCH -nect RFC v2 0/2] block: fix uaf in bd_link_disk_holder()
  - From: Yu Kuai

Prev by Date: [PATCH 5/6] dm: track per-add_disk holder relations in DM
Next by Date: [PATCH 6/6] block: remove delayed holder registration
Previous by thread: [PATCH -nect RFC v2 2/2] block: fix uaf for bd_holder_dir
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -nect RFC v2 0/2] block: fix uaf in bd_link_disk_holder()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux