Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 11:35:59 +0800, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Diff v3 VS v2
> 1. Invert the check of 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' and return early from the
> function for the error case.
> 
> Diff v2 VS v1:
> 1. Introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper instead of 'blk_trace_switch_state'.
> 2. Move stop block trace from '__blk_trace_remove' to 'blk_trace_cleanup'.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] blktrace: introduce 'blk_trace_{start,stop}' helper
      commit: 60a9bb9048f9e95029df10a9bc346f6b066c593c
[2/3] blktrace: fix possible memleak in '__blk_trace_remove'
      commit: dcd1a59c62dc49da75539213611156d6db50ab5d
[3/3] blktrace: remove unnessary stop block trace in 'blk_trace_shutdown'
      commit: 2db96217e7e515071726ca4ec791742c4202a1b2

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux