On 10/19/22 1:16 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 10/18/22 22:12, Yi Zhang wrote: >> The new minimum size for the xfs log is 64MB which introudced from >> xfsprogs v5.19.0, let's ignore it, or nvme/013 will be failed at: >> > > instead of removing it set to 64MB ? What is the advantage of hard-coding any log size? By doing so you are overriding mkfs's own best-practice heuristics, and you might run into other failures in the future. Is there a reason to not just use the defaults? Thanks, -Eric
